Try Twitch Prime

The P-38: Is Size And Shape
A Disadvantage?

A comparison with Allied fighters

A P-47D, P-38L and P-51D flying as tight as possible.
Does either stand out?
USAF via Warren Bodie

One important factor of air to air combat is seeing the enemy, or more importantly, seeing the enemy before he sees you. The old adage says that "you never get shot down by a fighter you can see". There is much to support this statement. Consider that nearly 90% of pilots shot down (and survived) never saw his attacker until it was too late to do anything but try to stay alive.

Therefore, survival depends a great deal on a pilot's situational awareness. In simple terms, to be aware of what is going on around one's aircraft. To have your head "in the cockpit" is to invite disaster. One must have their head on permanent swivel.

But let us assume that every pilot in the air at any given time is fully alert. Let's also assume that they all have 20/20 vision. What differences remain are outside vision as determined by the aircraft's design, the size and shape of the enemy aircraft and how well that aircraft blends in with the background.

The aircraft providing the best view out are the ones with bubble type canopies such as the P-51D, Fw-190 and the Yak-3 to name only a few. There were some fighters that had very poor outward vision because the canopy was heavily framed, or small. Those canopies that were faired into the fuselage, generally provided for the worst outward vision. Fighters such as the Bf-109 and the Hawker Hurricane come to mind as having less than satisfactory canopy designs. The P-38 Lightning, while having a very large glass area suffered from having two engines and a large wing to obscure vision below on either side.

Here we have, from right to left, three view illustrations of the
P-38, P-47 and P-51. A Bf-109G is added for the sake of comparison.

Perhaps, the next greatest factor was the size and shape of the fighter itself. Some fighters, such as the Bf-109 were quite small, and very difficult to spot at a distance. Other fighters such as the P-47, was remarkably large for single engine aircraft, and hence, were easier to detect at longer ranges.

A large and/or distinctive shape certainly presented some handicaps. Yet, they could also provide a few advantages as well.

Pictured is a P-38F-5-LO and a Spitfire Mk.Va on the Lockheed ramp. While the Lightning is larger,
with its twin booms, the distinctive wing shape of the Spitfire is a dead givaway as well.
LAC via Warren Bodie

First the handicaps: Distinctive shapes, such as the P-38's twin boom, twin engine design, is easily identified , especially from above or below. A large round fuselage, like that of the P-47 Thunderbolt can alert an enemy to its identity before the "Jug" pilot can identify the enemy. This gives the "other guy" an obvious edge. Some aircraft have distinctive wing shapes, such as the Spitfire with its broad elliptical planform which made its identification nearly instant when viewed from either above or below. Any time your enemy can I.D. you before you have detected his presence, you are at a disadvantage. Your enemy can now determine when or if he will engage, or worse, he can gain a position where he can utilize the fighter pilot's oldest ally, the sun. If you happen to be flying an especially large aircraft, it is also more likely to be hit by enemy fire. Although, in general a larger aircraft can usually absorb more damage than the smaller fighter.

In this unusual photo, three RAF P-47D-22-RE Thunderbolts make a low pass followed
closely by a P-38J. Notice that the P-38 presents a very small frontal area as compared
to the rotund "Jugs". The P-38J does not appear in the original photograph, it was added
by this writer for its comparison value.

The advantages: How many P-38 pilots, who, chasing an enemy fighter through a bomber formation, owe their lives to the unique shape of their fighter. The fact that virtually any gunner could readily identify the P-38 prevented many a Lightning pilot from suffering the fate of more that a few P-51s. Being peppered by .50 caliber slugs because you look too much like an enemy fighter was always a fear. The P-38 drivers had the advantage of not looking like anything flown by the Luftwaffe or the Japanese. Another advantage of a distinctive shape was, since you were likely be to identified first, the enemy may elect to look for an easier target and head off elsewhere. That same standout aircraft has a far better chance of not being fired on by friendly anti-aircraft batteries. Especially when flying low over front line combat areas. The P-47 was an easy aircraft to identify, however, it was not unusual for a novice pilot to call them out as Fw-190's or even A6M Zero's. Yet, in general, this was more to do with the terror of those first combat missions, when even seagulls looked dangerous.

Certainly the most unusual looking fighter flown by the Allied Air Forces was the P-38 Lightning. Powered by two Allison V-1710 V12 engines, it was a relatively large fighter measuring 52 feet in wing span and nearly 38 feet long. Nonetheless, Except in planform, it was not an easy fighter to spot nor to identify. In profile, the P-38 actually offers less square feet of area than the P-47. From directly ahead or behind, the Lightning presented its knife edge wing with three bumps (two engines and a central fuselage). Several of the surviving Japanese aces have written that spotting a P-38 head or tail-on was very hard. And as a general rule, most Japanese pilots tended to see the P-38 head-on as it bore in on them.

Another photo of the Thunderbolt, Lightning and Mustang formation.
The P-38 simply does not stand out due to its size when viewed
from this angle.
USAF via Warren Bodie

Hopefully, after reading the text and studying the three view drawings and photographs provided, you will see that as big as the P-38 was, it was not necessarily the easiest to spot or identify when rushing at you (or escaping). Nor should it be difficult to spot the advantages and disadvantages of the big Lightning, which in general, tend to offset each other sufficiently enough that its unusual shape and large size presented no real disadvantage as compared to its Allied contemporaries.

Return To Planes and Pilots of WW2 Main Page

Unless otherwise indicated, all articles Copyright Corey C. Jordan 1998.
Where indicated, photos Copyright Warren M. Bodie 1994.
Reproduction for distribution, or posting to a public forum without express
written permission is a violation of applicable copyright law.